Bannings
-
@Aria Thank you for sharing! I think a lot of us are more than willing to try

-

-
Even if I want to yell at someone about how theyāre being a total shitty asshole, I want to yell at them with the right pronouns.
-
-
Even if I want to yell at someone about how theyāre being a total shitty asshole, I want to yell at them with the right pronouns.
I laughed way harder at this than I should have.
See, everyone? @Roz has it.
āTheyāre being a totally shitty asshole.ā
āI want to yell at them.ā
āUgh, Aria. Theyāre the fucking wooooorst.ā -
There isnāt some sort of nodebb plugin thatād let people add pronouns somewhere handy, is there? Maybe to the little hover tooltip over avatars, or at least an entry in the profile form? Could be nice.
-
There isnāt some sort of nodebb plugin thatād let people add pronouns somewhere handy, is there? Maybe to the little hover tooltip over avatars, or at least an entry in the profile form? Could be nice.
You can put it in your signature. (Because no, there isnāt any that I can find. There were a few, and they havenāt been updated in eons.)
-
@Pavel Gotta add to mine, and everyone should also maybe link to the top of their āwhere to find me/join in my crimes against MUSHdomā thread, if they have one.
Or donāt Iām not your mom. At least, not yet.
-
-
-

-
@GF Yes. Thatās pretty much it. Though being plus-sized, which also comes with BREASTS*, Iām also keenly aware that I will never quite be able to figure out if Iām not entirely comfortable identifying as female because Iām not female or because Iām just bad at performing it āproperlyā.
Regardless of the changes I make to my appearance, people will continue to perceive me as distinctly female, just either with the additional labels of ābutchā, ādykeā, āunprofessionalā, ālazyā, or āphysically ill todayā, all of which Iāve received at varying times when having short hair, wearing menās clothes, or not wearing makeup.
I donāt know the answer to my own question, and wonāt ever be able to find out, because Iām also not the right size or shape to do āambiguously queerā properly, either.
*Watch the video. Itās hilarious.
-
-
@Pavel Itās an SNL sketch called āLingerie Storeā and is a wildly accurate and wildly entertaining portrayal of what trying to buy a bra is like when you practically need industrial equipment to carry 'em around.
-
-
As the old āThose who are not welcome were those engaging in personal attacksā line has been trotted out again, letās actually look at what happened.
So. The bannings started after Ganyās post of 7:31pm on the 5th of May.
The first people to post was Karmabum stating they were not breaking any rules, and Gany should go back to pretending this isnāt happening. Result? Ban
Second is Snackness saying Karmabum was accurate and that she isnāt sorry for posting, as she isnāt in secondary school. Result? Ban
Tsar says it is obvious Gany doesnāt want convo, so why not lock the thread rather than ban people, critiqued Ganyās tone and suggested she step. away. Result? Ban
Arkandel posts mild criticism of Derpās ability to admit he is wrong, and asked for clarification on points. Result? Not banned.
Meg posts that people didnāt deserve this, and begs Gany to unban and lock thread. Result? Ban. Later reversed.
Third-Eyed Crow suggests Anglo Saxon fornication to Gany. Result? Banned (Note: The first real āpersonal attackā)
Narson, the evil dipshit, states they are confused on why Arkandel isnāt banned for the fourth post after no talking. Result? Banned.
Sahin asks āWhy?ā and posts a cat GIF. Result? Warning to āDonāt. Just Donātā.
Arkandel posts asking what did he do in response to Narson. Result? Gany offers to PM with him.
Gany posts to Sahin and Arkandel.
Ifrit posts critiques Ganyās āEmotionless Cat Lawyer Boyā persona, and suggests she has destroyed 10 years of community by not just stepping back, he then says goodbye. Result? Banned
Bear_Necessities repeats Third-Eyed Crowās offer. Result? Nothing at this point (Note: Arguably the second real āPersonal attackā)
Flyrannosaurus posts a gif of an M60 firing out of a helicopter. Resault? Nothing
Bear states they werenāt silenced and for Gany to stop and reverse bans. Result? Banned
Sahin says they wonāt stop and asks for ban. Result? Banned.
DeletedUser posts gif of mass slapping. Result? Nothing
Herja points out the hypocrisy in this action compared to Derp situation, and states Gany looks like a clown. Result? Ban
Prism states that theyād rather be banned than hang around with who is left. Result? Banned
Scar states Gany is unhinged. Result? Banned but then reversed.
Coin states āmessage receivedā. Result? Banned but reversed without comment and removed from even original banned list.
Groth asks if this is how it ends. Result? Nothing
Hellfrog posts a GIF asking what in tarnation. Result? Nothing
Selira says Gany has killed the board. Result? Nothing
Ghost posts a question mark, then says the baord is getting better from bannings in a second post. After a while he posts two more times, after another Gany ask to stop posting. Result? Finally banned. Then reversed.
3543thrh67 posts that Gany is surprised. Result? Nothing
Cobalt posts asking Gany to take a cool off. Result? Gany states she wonāt ban Cobalt for it.
ILuvGrumpyCat posts pointing out Ghostās problematic history, and also addresses their disappointment in Ganyās choices. States she can go ahead and ban them. Result? Banned
OldFrightful says just lock the thread. Result? Nothing
Roz posts that Gany has degraded her authority, and cross links to the Macha/Farfalla logs. Result? Banned
Now. When it comes to personal attacks, the more clear are Scar, Third-Eyed and Bear-Necessities. Of those, Scarās ban is reversed and Bear has to post a second time in order to get banned. The challenge to authority, the questioning of it, rather than the personal attack is what gets the ban. And Iād argue that is the more obvious common denominator there. And in terms of whether bans got reversed, several of those who were banned (Like Coin), Gany stated her own feelings that these were the hard ones. So friendship matters more in not being excluded (kindaā¦wellā¦whatās the term? Clique behaviour?).
So no, those that are unwelcome on MSB arenāt those who engaged in personal attacks. It is those that asked questions of an admin who admits their behaviour could be reasonably described as unhinged (hence the reversal of Scarās ban for the unhinged personal attack). Several of those who did engage in personal attacks or expressed glee at the bannings etc didnāt even get a warning. Again, suggesting that standards were relaxed for those supporting the admin position even if their behaviour mirrored or was worse than those being banned.
-
How I, a man famous for being willing to throwdown with anyone regardless of how much evidence my opinion has behind it, managed to not post in that shitstorm at all is beyond me.
-
I do not believe that those left involved at MSB are capable of running a successful online forum about text based role playing games. Whether you think that bar is high or hilariously low, they donāt cross it.
-
@Apos As with MUs, success is dependent on those judging. Even if nobody posts ever again, they will claim it is successful.
-
@Pavel yeah but theyāll know better themselves, they just wonāt admit it out loud
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login


