Bannings
-
@BloodAngel said in Bannings:
@Testament @kalakh Indeed. But, this too shall pass.
True.
But it often feels like an eternity for it to pass.
I don't know what I'm doing. Poke at Seven Nations sevennations.aresmush.com port 2021
-
@Testament It does indeed. Why I stay in this community rping has helped me through some very bad spots over the years.
-
@Jennkryst said in Bannings:
The new argument that this is merely the result of wanting more moderation and people are just mad that they are being moderated (because they’re super hypocrites and are now getting theirs), sure is a take.
People wanted moderation to fork threads or move them to different boards, and to ban the rapists or that one guy who sprouts up every couple months and tries to set everything on fire. So technically yes, more moderation was wanted.
But it is an extremely bad faith reading that the logical conclusion is ‘ban everyone who dares to speak out’. Pretty against the spirit of the job that was asked to be done, you might say.
And, you know, I don’t think anyone disagrees that someone who is actually harassing someone in DMs doesn’t deserve moderation. The point was that someone going “what are you even talking about, okay fine, message received, bye” and then blocking the other person isn’t engaging in harassment, even if there are multiple sentences in their last message. People got mad because it was actually an abuse of authority – and, ironically, directly contrary to their newly stated goals of following the spirit of the law rather than the letter. And the comparison to Ortallus, someone who flung around verbal abuse to multiple women on the board, is so fucking insulting.
she/her | playlist
-
@Jennkryst said in Bannings:
The new argument that this is merely the result of wanting more moderation and people are just mad that they are being moderated (because they’re super hypocrites and are now getting theirs), sure is a take.
People wanted moderation to fork threads or move them to different boards, and to ban the rapists or that one guy who sprouts up every couple months and tries to set everything on fire. So technically yes, more moderation was wanted.
But it is an extremely bad faith reading that the logical conclusion is ‘ban everyone who dares to speak out’. Pretty against the spirit of the job that was asked to be done, you might say.
And, you know, I don’t think anyone disagrees that someone who is actually harassing someone in DMs doesn’t deserve moderation. The point was that someone going “what are you even talking about, okay fine, message received, bye” and then blocking the other person isn’t engaging in harassment, even if there are multiple sentences in their last message. People got mad because it was actually an abuse of authority – and, ironically, directly contrary to their newly stated goals of following the spirit of the law rather than the letter. And the comparison to Ortallus, someone who flung around verbal abuse to multiple women on the board, is so fucking insulting.
Ah, but you see, wanting specific and measured enforcement means you want all the enforcement and by anyone elevated to the position and every decision is clearly what you were after, bing bong so simple.
-
The lengths people go to to avoid saying the words “I’m sorry” makes it feel like they’re worried saying the words is going to make them melt (like the wicked witch and the bucket of water). It shouldn’t surprise me.
and yet it always does
I don’t get it, man. I don’t actually think it’s that hard to take responsibility and apologize.
-
Thank you @Meg for giving me the second ban of my life.
Yet I am sure you did not get your personalized ban message, either! There is only one solution: we must all be un-banned, given our message, and then banned promptly after we inform her that the Message [has been] Received.
-
I believe the banning messages are saved in a log file. But I’m not sure if that’s saved locally for Meg or is stored somewhere else.
-
Congrats to the lucky winners of the unban lottery!
Honestly: really fucking wild.
she/her | playlist
-
-
All I could do was laugh at seeing that my ban was permenant. I’ve never been banned anywhere in 20 years of MUing. I never even had a “serious” conversation about my behavior. No warnings. I’m as interesting or scandalous as toasted white bread with nothing on it.
But I’m banned for asking why Gany didn’t just lock some threads or step away. Makes sense.
-
-
I have no intention of retracing my steps.
-
@helvetica I might be joining the ban crew. Posted oh havens me a slow clap. How rude.
This whole thing is beyond dumb.
-
It’s completely arbitrary.
let it be a challenge to you
-
At least still being banned prevents me from going back there for the sole purpose of pointing out that Ganymede is a coward who lacks the courage to stand by her own convictions.
Also that Derp is a misogynist prick who lacks the self-awareness to realize he’s the problem, not all of us.
(hi derp & gany & whoever else is lurking. when you get bored of echo-chambering with the four people that agree with you, you know where to find us.)
-
-
The haphazard and bizzare approach kind of confirms everything I’ve been thinking about Gany and Derp. I look forward to them repeating their new official truths and whatever nonsense they claim is ethics into their echo chamber. And well, echoes always work better in empty spaces I guess.
-
@BloodAngel I want to post the RIGHT TO JAIL gif but I also don’t want to take the enjoyment of doing that away from @tsar .
-
But, well, I told them I would wait for them to finish reviewing before I made any decisions, since that was their request. What they’ve demonstrated is that their review was conducted according to some bizarre internal metrics that banned @Narson for saying basically the same thing as @Meg who they rescinded the ban on, while simultaneously deciding that Ghost is a part of the community they want to keep but not @Roz or @tsar –
In short, a part of the community I will be putting behind me and not returning to.
But the attorney in me is super annoyed about the total absence of transparency and failure of standards or logic.
I am glad that the original wildly unjust ban was reversed, though.
let it be a challenge to you
-
@helvetica said in Bannings:
I have no intention of retracing my steps.
Don’t worry, we’ll always know the truth and have your sig to remind us.
