Staff Capacity

[Jennkryst]

Someone DM me later about kit-bashing WoD into Dresden FATE because I just had a dumb idea.

Back to staff capacity fixes, we could also, and this is a dangerous idea here… trust players won’t metagame too hard with the knowledge of secret behind the scene machinations.

JOKES ASIDE

I’m still hyped on Roster Games, because it addresses something a lot of MUs, and even some TTRPGs, forget: character creation is supposed to be a collaborative process. MU NPCs are not tailor built to the players (they can’t be)… but there should definitely be a ‘how can you connect to the NPCs or other PCs in the world?’ process that it feels like most games eschew, beyond the Wanted BB.

And rosters come with baked-in connections and plot hooks and goals.

[Tez]

@Jennkryst said in Staff Capacity:

Back to staff capacity fixes, we could also, and this is a dangerous idea here… trust players won’t metagame too hard with the knowledge of secret behind the scene machinations.

I don’t think it’s about this, even as a joke. I don’t want the knowledge, as a player. I want to engage with secrets and discover secrets. Playing an open hand game isn’t my idea of fun. Early Arx alpha/beta hype was a huge dopamine rush of discovery BECAUSE of the lack of knowledge.

[Pavel]

@Tez This. I don’t even like being able to see other characters’ sheets.

[Faraday]

@Jennkryst said in Staff Capacity:

And rosters come with baked-in connections and plot hooks and goals.

They totally do - but also some people (like me) dislike them intensely Same as what @Tez said about in-game secrets. Or my way of doing PVE games. Or FS3.

But that’s OK, because no game is going to appeal to everybody. You just have to pick the right tools for the kind of game you want.

@Jennkryst said in Staff Capacity:

Technically, you don’t need a plug in for that. You could just have a diceless WoD for the lulz and see where that leads.

There have been Ares games using the Generic RPG plugin. It uses PDF or text-based sheets and a generic dice system (where you roll 5d10 and manually interpret the results).

There are many levels between fully diceless and fully automated, and the complexity of the plugin is going to depend on where you set that dial.

[Pavel]

@Faraday said in Staff Capacity:

You just have to pick the right tools for the kind of game you want.

Amen. If you make your game for everyone, it’s not really for anyone. Least of all yourself.

[junipersky]

I’m too old for the bullshit that cones with staffing any more.

Edit: except here. You people are generally good at not breaking the rules, and Pyre and Tez are like lighting.

[Livia]

@junipersky said in Staff Capacity:

I’m too old for the bullshit that cones with staffing any more.

In my recent playing of CoD games this has basically been the overwhelming response. I saw games note that they need staff pretty badly and mostly just got ‘nah, I don’t wanna’ from the player base.

Plenty of folks willing to run stories and one shot scenes and all that, people are happy to ST, but very few seem to actually want to be staff anymore.

Seems to have resulted in a lack of CoD games, I’ve been tinkering off and on with a tinymux CoD setup of my own, with making an Ares plugin for CoD (which I do think would be good to have out there; for me personally the ‘WoD/CoD-but-not’ games for some reason just do not interest me much), but having the time to continue such projects remains an issue. Which is probably why there’s no one willing to staff these things, heh!

[Tat]

@Tez said in Staff Capacity:

I heard someone say nice things about Shattered plot documentation recently. CALLING ON @Tat and whoever else does that IDK. TAT WHO DOES THAT.

I don’t know what exactly they’re referring to, honestly. We use the built in Ares plot functionality (kind of poorly, if I’m honest), try to keep a very basic ‘high points of the plot’ Story So Far page somewhat up to date, and have pages for One-Shot Adventures that folks can run as well as a page outlining what types of plots need to be fuller PRPs and how to get one approved.

The two former are aimed at helping new folks know what the big points of story are.

The last two are aimed at enabling player GMs.

[Apos]

@Tez said in Staff Capacity:

I don’t think it’s about this, even as a joke. I don’t want the knowledge, as a player. I want to engage with secrets and discover secrets. Playing an open hand game isn’t my idea of fun. Early Arx alpha/beta hype was a huge dopamine rush of discovery BECAUSE of the lack of knowledge.

I have so much stuff planned for a relaunch and it’s like, ‘man those I think will be really fun mysteries and I should probably write them somewhere that’s not just in my head for when I get hit by a bus’

[Wizz]

@Tez said in Staff Capacity:

I want to engage with secrets and discover secrets. Playing an open hand game isn’t my idea of fun. Early Arx alpha/beta hype was a huge dopamine rush of discovery BECAUSE of the lack of knowledge.

lemme just…one sec…

kay, lol: this just doesn’t work as intended in a public MU environment, unless staff has a strong ability to keep the rate of plot exposure at least relatively the same for all the players.

I have a similar fondness for that style of storytelling and I think around a table of people who personally know and trust each other it’s a lot of fun, but as someone who did come in after few years, the intense focus on secrecy was an enormous turd in the otherwise mostly pleasant soup of the game’s culture in exactly the same way OOC masquerade made many WoD games huuuuge pits of toxicity.

expecting hundreds (or even just tens, to be real) of virtual strangers in this community with – to borrow phrasing someone else used here once – all the attendant social anxieties and mental health issues we have to keep huge fundamental gameplay/plot secrets from each other while the exposure gap just grew wider and wider was just…wild to me, in retrospect, and lead to some of the most deeply unsettling and very, very unfun player-to-player experiences I have ever had in the hobby.

I get that that was sort of a by-blow of the completely unintentional population explosion/popularity of the game, and that I’m not saying anything new necessarily? but like, I’ve been and will continue to be disappointed to see other games try to copy that specific part of Arx’s formula.

[icanbeyourmuse]

I feel like players are the reason why a lot of people nope out of staff. Not everyone but once you get that bad egg, it can spoil the experience for being staff.

This is a me part to why I am not willing to admin on most games: documentation. Help on commands (a lot of games have ‘hidden’ commands from my experience because not documented), relevant info for players, lack of plot documentation. To me, staff side at least, plots should be fully documented so that if, say, JennyStaff decides she doesn’t want to be staff but leaves her balls on the floor for someone else to pick up JonnyStaff can pick them up and with a bit of ease continue where Jenny left off. Jonny might not do things exactly as JEnny had envisioned but he can pick it up and it not feel like something new is being thrown out when stuff feels unfinished. I might be a bit of a hypocrite here since I don’t ‘plan’ anything I GM out but I am very open about my plans for things in an over all sense. If you couldn’t tell, documentation is a big thing for me. I would rather slog through a bunch of info in the news/theme/setting info/help/plot details than try to remember this ‘well known thing.’

I would happily be admin who’s purpose is to make sure documentation is fully available for everyone, to appropriate people, and not be involved in anything else (unless wanted). I hate the unwritten rules and the unwritten ‘common knowledge’ stuff so many games do. If the rule is important, make it in your available info! IF it is theme info, make sure it can be found in your theme.

I went on a bit of a rant. Didn’t mean too.

[Cobalt]

@icanbeyourmuse said in Staff Capacity:

I feel like players are the reason why a lot of people nope out of staff. Not everyone but once you get that bad egg, it can spoil the experience for being staff.

I shut my last game down because of the bad eggs. I sometimes regret it and think about re-opening, but I have another idea I have been working on. And I’m wanting to be a little more organized this time.

Plot information more available, some points written down so I have responses available faster, more of a back story, factions better fleshed out,etc.

I know it’s controversial but I’m planning to use ChatGPT to help make my writing clearer and help just get the stuff that needs out for people to read available. Not let it generate the stories mind you but clean up my thoughts and shit.

[SpaceKhomeini]

@Roz said in Staff Capacity:

I’ve been mulling lately over seeing an issue that looks particularly prevalent for WoD/CoD games, which is “we have to keep this questionable staffer because we don’t have anyone to replace them to run this sphere.”

It feels like the splat/sphere system can be especially difficult for managing staff, because – from what I’ve seen, and my experience in WoD is admittedly limited!! – it seems like oftentimes, staff just don’t know all the other spheres.

This is really why I think WoD/CoD games should be heavily sphere-limited. It’s also just a better experience for the players.

Maaaaybe you can have Vamp and Werewolf on the same game because it’s a familiar chocolate/peanut butter combo to people and the systems seem to have the fewest wild differences (not sure about NWoD/CoD, don’t @ me).

But Changeling? I haven’t witnessed good integrations of it and as much as I love Mage to death, that’s the Sphere that needs to be off in its own little corner for everyone’s good.

[L. B. Heuschkel]

Documentation, whether of admin stuff like player so and so did this thing to player so and so, or of plot points that GMs have to know is the lifeblood of a game in my not all that humble opinion.

A strong centralised GM can keep the show running story-wise until they burn out. Some people don’t burn out.

Once players get the feeling that they can take advantage of the system by sucking up to Admin A who will then do favours without telling Admin B – the game is done for. Players who can’t trust staff vote with their feet. I’ve seen several games crash and burn this way.

And that’s why we document on Keys to the point of anal compulsive. Every little change warrants a request so that later on, that player’s name can be searched on in the jobs archive and their entire history with staff can be revisited.

I’d never staff with people I don’t trust – but I have trusted and been wrong before.

[Pavel]

@L-B-Heuschkel said in Staff Capacity:

Some people don’t burn out.

Mmmn, this isn’t really true.

It’d be more accurate to say that they haven’t burnt out yet. It can absolutely happen at any time, like an aneurysm.

[kalakh]

There’s also the problem where WoD spheres, at least oWoD (I’ve no personal experience with nWoD) are just so fucking everywhere with power levels. Most Garou kick the everliving shit out of most vampires. Mages can vaporize everyone with a sneeze. Hunters…hahaha. I have no idea where Changeling sits because I’ve never tried it, and literally no one in the history of ever has played Wraith (shut up, you’re lying). They’re not designed to have a bunch of PCs playing them at the same time with each other, and while that’d be a delicate balance with tabletop, it’s got to be a nightmare on a MUSH.

I also think an OOC masquerade is just terrible for a WoD game. It seems to cause way more problems than it solves.

[MisterBoring]

@kalakh said in Staff Capacity:

There’s also the problem where WoD spheres, at least oWoD (I’ve no personal experience with nWoD) are just so fucking everywhere with power levels.

It’s this thought that has me now believing that WoD games (and it does apply to nWoD in both versions) should be single (or possibly 2-3) sphere games. Full WoD crossover is just a nightmare mechanically.

[Pyrephox]

@MisterBoring said in Staff Capacity:

@kalakh said in Staff Capacity:

There’s also the problem where WoD spheres, at least oWoD (I’ve no personal experience with nWoD) are just so fucking everywhere with power levels.

It’s this thought that has me now believing that WoD games (and it does apply to nWoD in both versions) should be single (or possibly 2-3) sphere games. Full WoD crossover is just a nightmare mechanically.

It could work, if games took the time to thoughtfully integrate the spheres in a way that made sense. But IME a lot of WoD/CoD games became willfully Balkanized, with both the players and the staff isolating themselves from other spheres, and basically just being separate games with a shared grid space. Which sort of worked, right until someone TSes the wrong person, or has a brawl in the wrong bar, and suddenly a whole fucking sphere boils out to do battle. Or something goes up on a board in public, but Wolf Staff doesn’t want to touch icky Vampires so if you’re a vamp don’t think about asking questions about this, it’s a sphere plot.

I would love to see more single-sphere games because it seems to be what a lot of players really want. But a lot of players also still have the idea that ‘well, if there’s not at least thirty people on, it’s a dead game’.

[Pavel]

@Pyrephox said in Staff Capacity:

I would love to see more single-sphere games because it seems to be what a lot of players really want.

Amen. My favourite WoD game remains Requiem for Kingsmouth. It wasn’t perfect, not by a long shot, but it was a single-sphere Vampire the Requiem game - with mortals and, I think, psychics and shit too, but Vampire was the main driving force. The single-sphere approach allowed the whole game to be designed around mechanics vampires use: Territory, hunting, influence, etc.

[SpaceKhomeini]

@kalakh

Also OOC masquerades are often laughably dimwitted and flimsy.

Yeah, I see you, obvious Nosferatu. You wrote up that character at 3 am on a fucking Dennys napkin and me pretending to not know what this is makes us all a little dumber.