Bannings

[kalakh]

@Tez said in Bannings:

@icanbeyourmuse said in Bannings:

A couple days of AWOL and things go wild.

FWIW, all you had to do was stop looking for 12 hours and MSB went fkn wild. I was bewildered last night. I remain bewildered this morning.

@icanbeyourmuse said in Bannings:

All I gotta say is I still think they are the ones trying to keep the dramas going. It seems like as soon as the subject of MSB starts to drop from here, they do something to stir it up again. I’m not saying the posts ‘finish’ but the conversations in them just wander off to jokes/a new direction.

I don’t know. I have it on good authority that–

Ghost @ MSB

The current state of things is that whenever people from BMD get bored due to lack of regular victims over there, some unmanned ones come over here to try to stir up drama with no end result, then either get banned to get positive responses from their peers OR get bored, complain about this place being an echo chamber, and then hibernate until they get bored again because the usual targets aren’t over there.

I’m sure it’s our fault because we are–

Ghost @ MSB

…the flood of banned people (who have been stewing in a banned state)

This offends me. I never run out of victims, I’m not some amateur.

[Pavel]

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

[Third Eye]

Hi, Ghost. I promise, I don’t want to go back to MSB or new MSB but unbanning so I can block you again would be nice.

[Tez]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

Non-sarcastically, I read it, and I’m not sure either.

[Meg]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

the same thing they accuse us of every time, pinky.

we get bored here, go stir up trouble there, because we are never happy unless we are mean girl bullying people. so without people here to bully, we have to go back to MSB to do it.

[Testament]

@Pavel I’m not going to go over there and look. But it seems Ghost’s nauseating superiority complex and preaching from his pedestal like he’s some kind of moral arbiter is a joke and has been turned up to 11.

But remember, he quit mushing.

[Herja]

They don’t need to import mean girl bullies. They have their own right there!

[kalakh]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

I mean, I dunno about you, but I was accused of TSing poMonique and banning Rysen because I was jealous of his storytelling skills.

[KarmaBum]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

It’s been a few days since Macha whined about her job, so they are back to picking on us again.

tl;dr - we are a clique, they are not, and now derp has a huge admin dong and is not afraid to swing it SO DON’T TEST HIM

[Testament]

@kalakh You mean the plot he ran that was so terrible and out of theme, Apos had to retcon the entire thing and make the rule that you can no longer have your own alts involved in PRPs? You mean the plot where everyone had to assume that it was some kind of fever dream because of how off the rails it was?

You mean that level of storytelling?

[IoleRae]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

For those of us with lives outside of the internet, could someone give a CliffsNotes version of what MSB is accusing us of this time?

Some posters over there posted questions and disagreed with how things went down (some of whom are here, some of whom are not).

We sent them, apparently.

Also, lying liars were lying over there, and people commented on them being lying liars here, and that is stirring up trouble and we are terrible people for it.

eta: Also, apparently not mentioning my name when you lie about me means you’re not harassing me.

eta2: Also it’s OK to lie about me because somebody ELSE said something mean (that was accurate; it wasn’t the DM that was giving people roofie vibes, you slimy piece of shit, it was the insistence that you were doing nothing wrong AFTER being told to back off, it was your complete inability to leave me the fuck alone after being told directly, and how much I owed YOU a fucking explanation IN PRIVATE about what somebody ELSE did to me, AFTER YOU FUCKING THREATENED ME).

[kalakh]

@Testament said in Bannings:

@kalakh You mean the plot he ran that was so terrible and out of theme, Apos had to retcon the entire thing and make the rule that you can no longer have your own alts involved in PRPs? You mean the plot where everyone had to assume that it was some kind of fever dream because of how off the rails it was?

You mean that level of storytelling?

Apos has no appreciation for true art.

[Pavel]

Oh.

Okay.

I see.

[Snackness]

@GF Why you gotta go making hobos so much more interesting than he actually is?

[GF]

@Snackness Because I am a mean girl who starts whisper campaigns.*

*Wait, did hobos say that, or was that one of the others? Eh, never mind, I don’t care.

[Roz]

@Meg said in Bannings:

ETA: omg, i just noticed the edit under coin. That’s gold.

omfg i died

[KarmaBum]

@Pavel the less tongue-in-cheek response is that the new admins keep asking “what can we do to repair community trust,” and then answering all suggestions with “except that.”

[Pavel]

@KarmaBum said in Bannings:

@Pavel the less tongue-in-cheek response is that the new admins keep asking “what can we do to repair community trust,” and then answering all suggestions with “except that.”

Thankfully, over this side, @Tez is an anxious wreck about maintaining trust, @Pyrephox just thinks this place is neat, and I’m too jaded to give a shit about anything other than peace and quiet.

[Tez]

@Pavel said in Bannings:

@KarmaBum said in Bannings:

@Pavel the less tongue-in-cheek response is that the new admins keep asking “what can we do to repair community trust,” and then answering all suggestions with “except that.”

Thankfully, over this side, @Tez is an anxious wreck about maintaining trust, @Pyrephox just thinks this place is neat, and I’m too jaded to give a shit about anything other than peace and quiet.

WHOA I DIDN’T ASK FOR THIS KIND OF VICIOUS ATTACK ON MY CHARACTER. do not perceive me

[Testament]

So can we ask for things and not get passive aggressive to borderline hostile responses?

Can I have a pony?