Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    AI Megathread

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved No Escape from Reality
    261 Posts 46 Posters 31.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • HobbieH
      Hobbie @dvoraen
      last edited by

      @dvoraen This is one of my favourite reads lately: https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/

      FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
      • FaradayF
        Faraday @Hobbie
        last edited by

        @Hobbie I love that one.

        Friend quoted me this recently:

        "It’s like ChatGPT has read everything on the internet, and kind of vaguely remembers some of it and is willing to make up the rest.”

        There are so many documented instances of LLMs making up nonsense. Citing books that don’t exist. Making up fake lawsuit citations. Misrepresenting articles written by journalists. Making up fake biographical details. The code it spits out is often garbage (or, worse, wrong in subtle ways). And that’s not even touching on all the random stupidity where it tells people to use glue in their pizza or incorporate poison into their recipes.

        The whole GenAI industry is most likely just a big bubble built on a con.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
        • J
          Juniper
          last edited by

          People call this “hallucination”. I think we should stop letting them assign a new name to an existing phenomenon. The LLM is malfunctioning. It is saying things that are wrong. It is failing to do what it was designed to do.

          RozR O 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • RozR
            Roz @Juniper
            last edited by

            02ee925c-2af8-4246-b893-3558ae991bcd-image.png

            she/her | playlist

            FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • FaradayF
              Faraday @Roz
              last edited by

              @Roz

              “They’re designed to produce statistically probable sentences.”

              Exactly. Sometimes what is statistically probable is also correct: “What is the capital of France?” will most likely correctly tell you “Paris” because Paris has a high statistical association with “capital of France”.

              But this methodology is inherently unreliable for giving facts. A LLM might confidently assert that George Washington cut down a cherry tree, just because there’s a common association between Washington and that story, even though historians largely believe it’s a myth. Elon Musk associated with Teslas + Teslas associated with car crashes + Elon Musk associated with a car crash leads to a LLM erroneously asserting that Elon Musk died in a fatal Tesla crash. Sure, it’s a statistically probable sentence, but it’s just not true. The LLM doesn’t know whether something is true, and it doesn’t care.

              PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • PavelP
                Pavel @Faraday
                last edited by

                @Faraday said in AI Megathread:

                The LLM doesn’t know whether something is true, and it doesn’t care.

                I know this may seem like a quibble, but I feel it’s an important distinction: It can’t do either of those things, because it’s not intelligent. It’s a very fancy word predictor, it can’t think, it can’t know, it can’t create.

                He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                BE AN ADULT

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • RucketR
                  Rucket
                  last edited by

                  As more and more time passes and AI becomes more and more widespread all I can think is, “When do we declare our Butlerian Jihad?” Because I’m kinda over all this stuff already lol.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                  • AshkuriA
                    Ashkuri
                    last edited by

                    The AI problem is now so bad that people are trying to defeat it with… more AI. I don’t even know. What is life.

                    What I do know is that if someone fed my poses into ChatGPT or similar, I’d be pretty pissed off about it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • MisterBoringM
                      MisterBoring
                      last edited by

                      Is it sad that I’ve met people whose natural writing and RP are so bad that I assumed they were LLMs incorrectly?

                      Proud Member of the Pro-Mummy Alliance

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • WizzW
                        Wizz
                        last edited by

                        spotted in the wild, made me lol at least as much as it made me groan.

                        alt text

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • J
                          Jynxbox @Pavel
                          last edited by

                          @Pavel said in AI Megathread:

                          @Faraday said in AI Megathread:

                          The LLM doesn’t know whether something is true, and it doesn’t care.

                          I know this may seem like a quibble, but I feel it’s an important distinction: It can’t do either of those things, because it’s not intelligent. It’s a very fancy word predictor, it can’t think, it can’t know, it can’t create.

                          (This very obvious rant is not directed to anyone in particular but I still feel like it needed to be said…)

                          Neither can a computer. It can’t think, it can’t know, it can’t create any more than an AI can. It can’t get nearly as close as AI can. But every person here still uses computers. No one’s given up the machine and accessories filled with toxic metals that have been clawed from the earth as quickly as possible without regard for the environment it might be disturbing for the purposes of profit. Metals that are so valuable they mean the potential end or continuation of wars that kill hundreds of thousands with body counts that go up every day that possession of these metals aren’t agreed upon or bargained away to stop the death and dying. Metals that will go into these computers we all use that will likely return to the earth to sit in a landfill forever with parts that will never biodegrade in exchange for being of limited, non-thinking, non-knowing, non-creative use for just a few short years.

                          Everyone here also uses the internet with all the filth and hate and disgusting things that can be found online. Darkwebnuffsaid. The same internet that contributed to the death of newspapers and the decline of journalism as well as people’s recognition of truth and facts. The same internet that allowed Amazon to put countless small businesses out of business across the world. But no one here has stopped using that. Everyone is still contributing online to the companies that track and store massive amounts of information on as many people as possible on servers around the globe that devour energy like a bottomless pit and exude heat like a hell-connected furnace, then weaponize that information for profit and political leverage so intense it can turn elections in the most powerful country in the world, very specifically by weaponizing fear and hate and turning those dials up to 11 on people’s internet feeds to sway votes with no regard for what those people might do with their fear and hate outside of the voting booth.

                          How is it that AI is the problem?

                          You can’t be serious.

                          Please.

                          One might think you are being just a tad too…

                          Critical.

                          But okay. Rant done. Get on your computer and tell me on the internet how AI is so problematic you won’t use it.

                          I’m totally listening.

                          FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • C
                            catzilla @MisterBoring
                            last edited by

                            @MisterBoring said in AI Megathread:

                            Is it sad that I’ve met people whose natural writing and RP are so bad that I assumed they were LLMs incorrectly?

                            a woman in a pink wig is sitting next to another woman in a colorful shirt .

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FaradayF
                              Faraday @Jynxbox
                              last edited by Faraday

                              @Jynxbox said in AI Megathread:

                              But okay. Rant done. Get on your computer and tell me on the internet how AI is so problematic you won’t use it.

                              I can. I did in previous posts, but I’ll recap briefly: There is a benefit/harm ratio to every invention mankind has ever made.
                              Harnessing fire can bring warmth, but it can also destroy. Splitting the atom can power a nuclear power plant or wreck untold destruction. The internet contains filth, but it also powers information, education, and human connections.

                              We have to gauge tools based on how they are used. GenAI, by my estimation, brings tremendous harm and next to zero actual good. Every use case I’ve seen - from customer service chatbots to research - is terrible compared to the human counterparts it’s driving out of business.

                              We also, traditionally, have gauged tools based on their legality. Napster brought free music to millions. Some saw that as a good thing, but it was illegal, and it was stopped. The GenAI industry is committing copyright infringement on a scale that would make Napster blush.

                              There are many people who boycott Amazon, social media, or whatever based on the harms they perceive. There are environmentalists who would scold me for the plastic soda bottles I use. We’re all allowed to pick our battles. Fighting GenAI is one of mine.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                              • O
                                Ominous @Juniper
                                last edited by Ominous

                                @Juniper said in AI Megathread:

                                People call this “hallucination”. I think we should stop letting them assign a new name to an existing phenomenon. The LLM is malfunctioning.

                                No, it is not. What the AI spits out is meaningless to the AI. It just spits out what the most likely next set of words are based on the input it received it has already given. For it to malfunction, it needs to start writing sentences devoid of grammar. As long as what it writes is grammatically correct and a somewhat rational statement, it has succeeded

                                It is saying things that are wrong.

                                Yes, but factually accurate answers are not the purpose. Grammatically correct sentences are.

                                It is failing to do what it was designed to do.

                                No. It is doing exactly what it is designed to do. It’s failing at doing what entrepreneurs, marketers, and other Pat Barnum snake oil salespeople want the public to think it can do.

                                EDIT: To actually contribute something to the thread, about the only thing I am willing to use AI on for MU purposes is played-bys and maybe creating images on the wiki for the various venues on the grid. I grew tired of seeing Jason Momoa as the image for Seksylonewolf McRippedabs.

                                Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post