Heckler's veto

eye8urcake

Conversations get heated. We get the offending parties to step outside (fork the rowdy posts) so other people can get back to their chat. If you come into our bar throwing actual faeces, then you’ll get thrown out. Simples.

makes sense

KarmaBum

Just wanted to throw out there - if you’re looking for a place that’s heavily moderated to discuss all things RPG, there’s always the RPG-D.

It’s oriented toward play-by-post, but (especially with Ares) they’re really not that far off MUSHing. I usually keep an account there and occasionally attempt to tap this resource for new players, but I’m not a good ambassador.

Polk

@Pavel Really glad to hear the forking talk from you guys. Thanks!

Testament

So pretty sure this is supposed to be the general commentary thread about the forum itself, so I have a rather hot take I’d want to share.

Maybe consider the idea of getting rid of upvotes. Which, I know, seems almost sacrilege. Or perhaps not getting rid of the function, but hiding the number and upvote gets.

Perhaps this is just me, but it’s one of those love/hate relationship with things. Seeking some kind of minor validation for upvotes received and then having this sense of being ignored when not.

Maybe having that thought or outlook on it is dumb. Or I’m just far too sensitive to the thoughts of others and how things I’m said are viewed. But I’m not sure I enjoy that small sense of endorphins when I receive feedback, positive or negative.

I think MSB(and here)not having downvotes is a good thing, because that can breed a particular sense of animosity and toxicity among the users of the forums, especially when you could see who was downvoting you.

I’m wondering if the same could said of upvotes. Granted, I’m not going to be upset if they’re not taken away or anything, but it has been something I’ve noticed perhaps moreso about myself lately.

Roz

I think the biggest issue that would come with getting rid of upvotes is that it’d inevitably end up with an increase in really basic “I agree” posts. So I’d almost fear that it’d make the overall feeling more prevalent, not less.

Jumpscare

@Roz I agree.

Testament

@Roz On that I agree with you, and how annoying would it be see a bunch of “I agree” posts(I know one of is going post just that at some point). I think the other potential avenue is not getting rid of the function, just hiding how many there are and by who.

And while I really really hate to make a comparison to YouTube and that example doesn’t wholly work here in a sense of sheer scope, but. That was something they did, hence what gave me the initial thought of it.

@Jumpscare Nevermind, it already happened.

Roz

@Testament said in Heckler's veto:

@Roz On that I agree with you, and how annoying would it be see a bunch of “I agree” posts(I know one of is going post just that at some point). I think the other potential avenue is not getting rid of the function, just hiding how many there are and by who.

And while I really really hate to make a comparison to YouTube and that example doesn’t wholly work here in a sense of sheer scope, but. That was something they did, hence what gave me the initial thought of it.

YouTube still shows me the number of upvotes a video has gotten – do you mean something else? Just the identities?

I kind of feel like if there’s no feedback for the upvotes, it’d still result in the same behavior as the upvote feature not existing.

Polk

@Roz Youtube hid downvotes. They left upvotes.

Testament

@Roz Maybe something like that, just the identities. What I don’t want is something to turn into is some kind popularity contest, and there are times where it does seem like that. And in the past, that has seemed like that’s what it is, despite whether or not that actually true, there is a sensation that that’s what it feels like. I suppose not taking the function away, maybe simply leave it more nebulous

ETA: Again, I just wanted to open the discussion as to what people feel about it on the whole. If it stays, no biggie. Just something I wanted to discuss.

Mourne

@Roz I think (maybe, thinking might be too strong of a word) that what @Testament means is that we have no downvotes. So the lack of upvotes amounts to the same thing as being downvoted. It’s the silence of either A) Being ignored or B) Nobody agrees with you.

In that respect upvotes are still a measure in which negative connotations can be made. So if we’re trying to avoid negativity, then we need to ignore positivity as well as the lack of positive reinforcement is by it’s nature a negative situation when there is no clearly defined negative response.

Also, in that respect, by seeing names associated with upvotes, we’re again having the potential of seeing ‘blocks’ of individuals, because humans are keyed to see patterns in /everything/. It’s just how our brains work.

sao

@Testament I feel some confusion here. Do you mean that knowing who is upvoting creates a popularity contest?

Testament

@sao Kind of? @Mourne explained it better than I could’ve. Because I shouldn’t write these kind of thoughts while in a Teams meetings. Also, because I’m probably an idiot.

Herja

So would it be better or worse to see 20 posts that agree with the person that is not you and also just say exactly what they said? Because I think that is exactly what is going to happen. Upvotes prevent some of that. You can’t really restrict people interacting with people they agree with even if you take away upvotes. If this board gets rid of upvotes, that’s fine but I’m not really cool with policing to the point where I can’t even just throw up a post in support of a good point because someone is reading way too much into these interactions and taking them to heart when nothing personal is meant.

KarmaBum

@Testament If you have StyleBot, you can hide them on your end:

span.votes {
    display: none;
}

Third Eye

@Roz said in Heckler's veto:

I think the biggest issue that would come with getting rid of upvotes is that it’d inevitably end up with an increase in really basic “I agree” posts. So I’d almost fear that it’d make the overall feeling more prevalent, not less.

My genuine defense of downvotes has always been that I think they prevented a bunch of repetitive ‘UR WRONG’ posts, and I agree upvotes serve the same function. That said, I do think the forum is probably better off without downvotes and I wouldn’t mourn if upvotes were eliminated or, maybe preferably, anonymized.

farfalla

Is there a skin or… layout? Idk what do we call the way we make this place look?

Anyway, is there one that hides those things? Then people could opt out of seeing it.

I once let a single upvote make me think someone didn’t like me for like, a year, so I can see why someone might want to. I was eventually able to give myself a stern talking to and actively made an effort to see upvotes as just “I agree” or “thanks” or “valuable addition,” and no upvotes as just nothing at all, no meaning whatsoever. And now I’m like 75% sure that person likes me.

Roz

@Mourne said in Heckler's veto:

@Roz I think (maybe, thinking might be too strong of a word) that what @Testament means is that we have no downvotes. So the lack of upvotes amounts to the same thing as being downvoted. It’s the silence of either A) Being ignored or B) Nobody agrees with you.

In that respect upvotes are still a measure in which negative connotations can be made. So if we’re trying to avoid negativity, then we need to ignore positivity as well as the lack of positive reinforcement is by it’s nature a negative situation when there is no clearly defined negative response.

Also, in that respect, by seeing names associated with upvotes, we’re again having the potential of seeing ‘blocks’ of individuals, because humans are keyed to see patterns in /everything/. It’s just how our brains work.

I intend this gently, and doing my best to be cognizant of how sometimes bad feels can just – really be bad feels. But this feels a little extreme to me, the idea that we have to kind of maintain a perfect neutrality here. If someone’s brain is kind of fixated on this in a bad way, then even doing something like removing the ability to see WHO upvoted a thing isn’t gonna help – if your brain is being a jerk, it’s just gonna fixate on who those anonymous upvotes might be (especially if they’re upvotes with posts disagreeing with you). So I don’t know that anonymizing would help the situation, either.

Testament

@Herja said in Heckler's veto:

because someone is reading way too much into these interactions and taking them to heart when nothing personal is meant.

Since I was the one that started this discussion, I’ll agree, there are times I completely take upvotes(or lack of upvotes)as an unsaid translation of what I’m saying is wrong, or that I’m simply not liked and merely a tolerated presence. And despite my countenance, I dislike how wishing for acceptance from those I share this hobby means so much to me. And at times, it does.

Again, whether or not upvotes stay or not, is fine. I suppose I just wanted to know if anyone else felt similar. A wonder if I was alone in that sensation.

Duke Whisky

I’m scared to upvote anything