MU Peeves Thread
-
@RightMeow said in MU Peeves Thread:
Also (vague post sorta)
REALLY?! Come on. I’m starting to think I have a creeper join here flag on me. Also, I really need to trust myself more when I’m thinking ehhh that seems a bit off and not excusing it with new player/IC relationship expectation/just overly excited person without social clues.
I think a lot of absolute weirdos rely on that to get by. When you call them out on whatever thing they’re doing that’s offputting, they’ll tell you that they’re new or excited. The problem is that some people genuinely ARE new and even going from a MUD to a MUSH format can be a real culture shift that can be hard to adjust to. And they take advantage of people’s willingness to give folks slack for those instances.
And that sucks. Because eventually people get burned of that and they stop giving genuinely new folks chances because you start thinking all new people are just full of it and some repeat ban offender.
-
I think what got me about this last was negative ooc complaining at a constant and somewhat inappropriate (in the sense of directing that venting at someone not known well) level right off the bat. To an exhausting level. I chalked it up to me being intolerant/less able to handle stuff due to RL stress/feeling stretched thin. I suppose it was borderline reportable at the time but it wasn’t creeper stuff and again I was worried I was just being oversensitive. (Which could have been the case anyway).
But I have had a few people ping me as off lately for reasons that I can’t put my finger on and I do feel bad bc its made me avoidant where usually I would love stepping up to help if desired, because its not to the level I feel comfortable officially reporting and I mean let’s face it, my tolerance level is way way lower than my norm.
-
@mietze I ran into a very similar feel lately: dealing with someone who ran right up against the edge of what I would consider overt bad behavior, but – was it me? Maybe I was oversensitive! Maybe I was overreacting! Who ISN’T low-energy and raw-nerved lately?
It was really kind of a bummer for me, too, because it was a situation where I was really excited – and swiftly regretted it as more and more red flags popped up. I always joke about vetting my RP partners and all, but HONESTLY, I do.
she/they
-
This post is deleted! -
@Tez I vet the shit out of my RP partners. I probably end up painting myself into corners more often than not because of it, but I am just so done with BS.
-
I will never blame the people that get caught up with predatory people. Vetting is a good idea but I think most people have a story about one who slipped past the radar and that is not your fault.
-
I’m sometimes reminded of something my mother used to say(1): “If people talk about others like this in front of you, how do they talk about you to others?”
(1): Probably the one sane thing she used to say.
People who start new acquaintances on games with bashing everyone and every game they were ever on before are very likely just looking for disappointment (whether they realise it or not) and you’re bound to become the next notch on their complaint list in short time.
There are legit complaints, of course. And there’s being mad at everyone and everything.
-
Simply put and this is pretty much what I go by.
"If people who you perceive as friends or associates can not come to you to have an adult conversation on something that you might of said or done and why it bothered them, resulting in them saying nothing at all?
Then they were never your friend to begin with."
If a friend of mine had done or said something that upset me, I’m going to tell them, and we’re going to talk about it. Because I respect them enough to talk about it. If they can’t do the same for you? Then they never actually respected you.
I don't know what I'm doing. Poke at Seven Nations sevennations.aresmush.com port 2021
-
@Testament said in MU Peeves Thread: If a friend of mine had done or said something that upset me, I’m going to tell them, and we’re going to talk about it. Because I respect them enough to talk about it. If they can’t do the same for you? Then they never actually respected you.
Had a harsh reminder of this last month and it’s still true. When somebody ghosts you and then acts as if you should know what was wrong – then they don’t think you’re worth the effort of telling what you did (assuming that you did anything at all).
-
@L-B-Heuschkel Exactly. This same thing happened to me a number of months ago at work. Someone who I had worked with for the last two years. They ghosted me and I never figured out why, as they won’t discuss it with me. It’s a particular level of immaturity that I don’t tolerate. We’re not in high school, and you’re not a teenager. You’re an adult. But if you’re going to hide behind the cause of “Well I don’t like confrontations.” That’s on you, but you’re also an asshole for not telling me what happened, I’m not a mind-reader.
-
I know it’s hard when you’re on the negative end of someone refusing to talk to you, but there are plenty (plenty!) of very good reasons to not talk to somebody once they’ve made you uncomfortable. It’s not unreasonable just by virtue of stepping back and refusing to talk.
Nobody owes you their time or explanation. If someone has been made uncomfortable – or is triggered – fault is irrelevant, and it’s OK to just walk away from somebody that hurt you.
Frustrating as it is to be on the receiving end of it, nobody owes you their time after they’ve been hurt (even if they were hurt by something in their own head).
It’s just like it is on mushes in the real world; if somebody came to you (general) on your game because somebody made them feel unsafe, you absolutely would not pressure them to sit down with the person who made them uncomfortable to “talk it out” – we ALL know better than this, I would hope. This extends to the meat suit world for the same reasons.
“But I didn’t make them feel unsafe!” <- you (general) don’t know that, and you (general) sound just like Cullen when you say it.
the entity previously known as Sunny
-
@IoleRae said in MU Peeves Thread:
This extends to the meat suit world for the same reasons.
In general, absolutely. However, there are some therapeutic techniques that recommend confronting the sources of one’s frustration and discomfort - though usually under supervised and controlled circumstances, and not just a chat at the office canteen. So in certain circumstances it can be helpful to do, as a supervisor or whatnot, but it shouldn’t be the first tool you reach for from your toolbox
-
@IoleRae I agree with this to an extent. But there is a level of frustration when you see this person every day at work. I think there’s a particular different dynamic going on when you have to interact with someone in as professional a way as possible without knowing what you did you upset them. Especially in an every day setting. In a mush you can just leave the mush and go play somewhere else. Your job is a bit different.
You’re right, you’re not owed an explanation, but in that same token, that same thing shouldn’t be consistently held against you, especially when you don’t know what was said or done.
Granted, this is also why we have HR departments to deal with these situations. And mushes distinctly lack that, because I don’t believe that’s a role that staff should have.
In the end, I hold to my original point. If someone can’t or won’t talk to you about something you may of said or done, and specifically using an instance when you don’t know or aren’t aware of what you said or did, it’s on the offended to deal with that. You can not hold someone accountable or expectations to change or improve if they are not even aware of what caused the difficulty.
I don't know what I'm doing. Poke at Seven Nations sevennations.aresmush.com port 2021
-
@Testament said in MU Peeves Thread:
Granted, this is also why we have HR departments to deal with these situations.
In theory, yeah. In practice… they certainly seem more like extensions of a company’s legal department to cover their asses.
-
@Pavel said in MU Peeves Thread:
@Testament said in MU Peeves Thread:
Granted, this is also why we have HR departments to deal with these situations.
In theory, yeah. In practice… they certainly seem more like extensions of a company’s legal department to cover their asses.
Also agree with that. HR is usually out there to make sure that the company’s interests and image is protected. I should’ve stated that in a ‘ideal situation’ type thing. At the same time, I’ve also had some good exchanges with some HR people that specialize in conflict resolution, so I won’t say all, I’ll say most.
I don't know what I'm doing. Poke at Seven Nations sevennations.aresmush.com port 2021
-
@Testament Apparently there’s a big drive, at least in some corners of Corporate Australia, for HR people to have psychology degrees/experience. So that they actually can help in these situations.
It’s slow going, obviously, but it’s apparently a thing.
-
@Testament said in MU Peeves Thread:
In the end, I hold to my original point. If someone can’t or won’t talk to you about something you may of said or done, and specifically using an instance when you don’t know or aren’t aware of what you said or did, it’s on the offended to deal with that. You can not hold someone accountable or expectations to change or improve if they are not even aware of what caused the difficulty.
I don’t disagree; what I disagree with is labeling people immature or otherwise problematic because they’ve chosen to not engage with you. It’s a self-defense mechanism, and you don’t know what’s happened in their life. I absolutely know it’s frustrating; it’s never not going to be – as humans, we WANT to fix things, and it messes with us when we can’t. But the only thing to do is let it go – and if it interferes with getting your job done, you go to your boss for help with getting your job done, and then HR if your boss can’t help.
Is it your problem? No, absolutely not, and it’s not something you need to address/deal with/engage with in any way. I don’t think it’s your responsibility and I don’t think they should hold you accountable for not knowing, that’s not reasonable.
‘Do not engage’ is not holding somebody accountable, it’s just self-defense.
-
@IoleRae I agree – to an extent.
When somebody ghosts you out of the blue while simultaneously harping on to mutuals about how they still want to be friends and pretending everything is a-okay except that they refuse to share a space with you – then no, that’s not okay. That’s when you do owe an explanation for the way you’re behaving.
If somebody steps away quietly from someone else and doesn’t want to tell them why, it can indeed be that they have tried and the person they are stepping away from just can’t or won’t hear it.
But sometimes, it’s a matter of the narcissist discard for a new and better toy, too.
Any pronouns. Come to Chincoteague. We have ponies. http://keys.aresmush.com
-
That’s a bunch of other problematic behavior being conflated with ‘do not engage’. ‘Do not engage’ isn’t the problem; ghosting and ending contact isn’t the problem. In the described instances, melodrama is the problem.
the entity previously known as Sunny
-
I’m going to make a mess of this and hopefully it doesn’t come across as word-salad. I think this is a difficult topic to broach. Everyone has a differing level of what makes them comfortable to engage with when it comes to conflict, and sitting down to discuss things can often be more than someone can handle.
Is this “fair” to both parties? No, it’s not. One party can be severed from contact and have no idea why, while another party turtles out of self-preservation.
It’s not fair, but it also doesn’t have to be.
It’s not incorrect for the party who can’t handle the conflict resolution to just straight up drop it like a hot potato because they emotionally can’t (or don’t want to) handle it.
It’s also not incorrect for the party who has been ghosted to feel lost, hurt, or confused by this behavior. It’s one of those unfortunate situations where (I stress that in this situation we’re assuming good intent and a misunderstanding from all parties) it’s very easy to reach an impasse where no one is really wrong, but an uncomfortable situation has arisen that simply won’t be remedied.
The mediator in me wishes there were a way around these impasses, but there’s no practical way to do so without encroaching on the boundaries of one party. Until or unless both parties are willing to discuss it, there’s nothing further to be done.
