Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Star Trek Games

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Game Gab
    17 Posts 5 Posters 371 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JennkrystJ
      Jennkryst @Faraday
      last edited by Jennkryst

      @Faraday said in Star Trek Games:

      Like, say I’m a junior Engineering crewman. What is my RP about?

      Hobbies. You’re in a classical quartet or jazz band that puts on shows at the bar… or do a Doctoro Picardo and recreate old opera houses to do… opera. Go fill up the biofilters on the fuck simulator holodeck with your inceedibly inappropriate hologram girlfriend. Build a racing shuttle. Write holonovels. Save humanity by completing a Q test. Do weird yoga. Invent silly sports. Have sex with a ghost. Visit Risa. Have sex with a ghost on Risa in a holodeck. Do unofficial war crimes.

      Do it again.

      Maybe you’re on duty. Every time an alert happens, system diagnostics are run, go go go! Even when there isnt an alert, you still need to run regular diagnostics to make sure that the ~~ LCARS is properly filled with rocks so there is debris when it dramatically overloads~~ self-sealing steam bolts are properly bolted in place. Go crawl through the Jefferies Tubes to replace the bio-conduit before it catches the flu from alien cheese. Realize it’s the wrong tube when you meet Jeffrey Combs. Get sent on an away mission.

      There is a whole chart, for roll d20 to [science] the [device] for [techbobabble].

      There are a lot of options out there.

      Edit: Yellow in TNG is also where temporal enforcement lives, so be a time cop when you get too many tachyons, or whatever the current wibbly-wobbly technobabble of the week uses.

      Mummy Pun? MUMMY PUN!
      She/her

      FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • PavelP
        Pavel @Raistlin
        last edited by

        @Raistlin said in Star Trek Games:

        what would stop you from playing on a Star Trek game?

        Other people, generally.

        He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
        BE AN ADULT

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • FaradayF
          Faraday @Jennkryst
          last edited by

          @Jennkryst said in Star Trek Games:

          There is a whole chart, for roll d20 to [science] the [device] for [techbobabble].

          @Raistlin said in Star Trek Games:

          Find some available people and do “Star Trek-y” things; take a shuttle out to explore an anomaly, run some training scenarios, tackle an engineering problem that’s cropped up

          Those aren’t the kinds of things that make Trek interesting, though. A team can’t just take a shuttle out, get some readings, and then go home. An engineer can’t just throw technobabble at a broken drive. That would be really boring to RP.

          Stuff has to happen. There have to be stakes. The drive needs to be fixed in time to get the ship away from some threat. The anomaly has to put the crew in peril somehow.

          Some players can generate those stories for themselves, sure, but many (most?) are going to need it handed to them. It’s much harder to craft engaging stories like that for a random assortment of characters from disparate departments than it is for a fixed group of series regulars + the occasional guest star/redshirt.

          MisterBoringM JennkrystJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MisterBoringM
            MisterBoring @Faraday
            last edited by

            @Faraday said in Star Trek Games:

            Stuff has to happen. There have to be stakes. The drive needs to be fixed in time to get the ship away from some threat. The anomaly has to put the crew in peril somehow.

            I think this might actually lead to more problems for a MU.

            Assuming a game focuses on a single ship or station, and the majority of players are playing that ship or station’s crew, any problem that puts the crew in peril puts most of the playerbase in peril. And it’s been my experience that if a PC is in peril, that PC’s player would like their character to have some hand in thwarting that peril. And if only 5-6 PCs in the whole game get to thwart that peril, it leaves an untold number of PCs just standing in the wings waiting for their chance. I think lack of spotlight would build up way quicker on a Star Trek MU than any other for that reason.

            Proud Member of the Pro-Mummy Alliance

            FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FaradayF
              Faraday @MisterBoring
              last edited by

              @MisterBoring “The crew” in that example could just be the crew of the shuttle, not necessarily the entire crew. But yes, you’re right about the general problem. My point is just that there needs to be something more going on besides just “Ensign Bob technobabbles the broken thing”, and players on the whole are not great at driving stuff like that (in my experience).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • RaistlinR
                Raistlin
                last edited by

                I think this conversation is largely over with everyone’s opinions stated, but I did want to address how I would handle the various scenarios people mentioned if I were actually playing a character in this situation.

                I’m making some assumptions here, including that staff supports player-driven RP. Honestly, I wouldn’t be on a game that didn’t.

                1. I log on and put out a call on the OOC channels looking for players who want to RP.
                2. I contact those folks and tell them their characters receive orders to report to Shuttle Bay 1.
                3. My character briefs them on a subspace anomaly that needs investigation. Should be routine sensor sweeps, but in Star Trek, it’s never routine.
                4. It’s not routine! The anomaly starts interfering with our warp core as we approach, meaning someone has to recalibrate the deflector array while another crew member pilots us to safety.
                5. We get dramatic RP with various characters contributing - someone pilots the shuttle, someone works the sensors to analyze the phenomenon, someone reroutes power to compensate for the interference.
                6. They make it back to the ship or station with their data, and now have something to debrief senior officers on and discuss in Ten Forward, setting up future RP hooks.

                This small, initial scene could lead to all sorts of future RP opportunities. Engineering could discover that the anomaly is affecting the station’s reactors, a strange illness could develop affecting either the away team or other crew members, etc.

                For me, I just don’t buy into the “there’d be nothing to do unless you’re a senior officer” belief. If you want RP, you can find RP. Star Trek has always been about the crew working together to solve problems, and there’s no reason a MUSH can’t capture that same collaborative spirit.

                PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • JennkrystJ
                  Jennkryst @Faraday
                  last edited by

                  @Faraday said in Star Trek Games:

                  Stuff has to happen. There have to be stakes.

                  This isn’t Trek-specific, it’s literally every MUSH ever.

                  Some players can be those three people on Voyager who never volunteer for any away missions and just do the social rp. Or be a Dabo Girl on DS9. It’s fine.

                  Mummy Pun? MUMMY PUN!
                  She/her

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • PavelP
                    Pavel @Raistlin
                    last edited by

                    @Raistlin said in Star Trek Games:

                    For me, I just don’t buy into the “there’d be nothing to do unless you’re a senior officer” belief

                    Historically, that has been the case. So you, or whoever is running this game, would have to prove otherwise. If you’re playing Crewman A. Nonymous you better not be anywhere besides a jeffreys tube and not getting in the way of the person we especially chose to play Lieutenant Commander Action “Buzz” Heroguy.

                    He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                    BE AN ADULT

                    JennkrystJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JennkrystJ
                      Jennkryst @Pavel
                      last edited by

                      @Pavel said in Star Trek Games:

                      If you’re playing Crewman A. Nonymous you better not be anywhere besides a jeffreys tube and not getting in the way of the person we especially chose to play Lieutenant Commander Action “Buzz” Heroguy.

                      Gentle reminder Harry Kim spent 7 years in the Delta Quadrant with a single pip, and while he may have manned the engineering console on the bridge, he was never a department head. He’s an ensign. There were five people on the ship with a lower rank - Nelix, Kes, Seven of Nine, Naomi Wildman, and Miral Paris (and technically the Maquis, but they got whole uniforms and pips to reflect their Maquis ranks, it’s fine).

                      And he still got up to some wacky shenanigans.

                      Mummy Pun? MUMMY PUN!
                      She/her

                      PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • PavelP
                        Pavel @Jennkryst
                        last edited by

                        @Jennkryst said in Star Trek Games:

                        There were five people on the ship with a lower rank

                        Gentle reminder that I’m talking about the enlisted crew, who constituted the vast majority of the ship’s complement and generally didn’t get to go on wacky adventures. I’m also, more pertinently, talking about past games that have existed not one of the TV shows, where people who weren’t lucky/connected/whatever enough to get a senior position didn’t get to have wacky shenanigans anywhere near as often as The Main Cast. So please don’t “gentle reminder” your way through ignoring my experience.

                        If you want your game like Lower Decks, focus on those people. If you want it like TNG, focus on those people. Yes, players can run shit, but staff run the game and set the tone; so if you’re focusing on telling a story about The Senior Officers that’s who people will want to be and will feel left out if they can’t.

                        He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                        BE AN ADULT

                        FaradayF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • FaradayF
                          Faraday @Pavel
                          last edited by

                          @Pavel said in Star Trek Games:

                          So please don’t “gentle reminder” your way through ignoring my experience.

                          100%. I’ve played on (and run) tons of military games, and the rank divide has always caused issues. There are ways around it, but it needs to be acknowledged and planned for.

                          @Pavel said in Star Trek Games:

                          Gentle reminder that I’m talking about the enlisted crew, who constituted the vast majority of the ship’s complement and generally didn’t get to go on wacky adventures.

                          Yeah, one of the things that always bugged me about Trek is that more of the wacky adventures rationally should have involved the enlisted crew. It’s a Hollywood-ism to always have the heads of departments doing everything, but that mentality also pervaded the Trek games I tried through the years.

                          Then again, Trek has always been weird about its handling of officers/enlisted. At one point in the 60’s, Roddenberry even insisted that Starfleet had no enlisted ranks at all. (This is seemingly contradicted not only by simple logic but also by various characters throughout Trek canon.)

                          I know Star Trek isn’t RL, but just for reference/scope, a US aircraft carrier would have ~3000 enlisted crew and ~200 officers. So even the most junior Ensign is still in the top 6% of personnel, rank-wise. Lower Decks seems to contradict that conclusion, so who even knows.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post